Design System Agency for
Product Teams at Scale

A decade building component libraries and design systems for product teams that need consistency, speed, and a single source of truth. Not templates. Research-led systems that teams actually use, built for the way your design and engineering teams work.

Get a free design system audit See our work

"Three years as our embedded design partner through our public offering. They understand what enterprise product teams need."

Natti Zick, Director of Design at Tenable

✱

"While their skills were valuable, it was ultimately their client management and interaction that impressed us."

Brett McLaughlin, CTO, Sticky.io

✱

"WANDR built our entire global design system. The consistency across our platform is something we couldn't have achieved without them."

Subha Shetty, VP of Product Management Fanatics

✱

LA - Silicon Valley - Austin - Miami - Mexico City

A Design System Agency Built on A Decade of Enterprise Outcomes

We built the entire global design system for Fanatics, one of the world's largest sports commerce platforms. We consolidated the global design system for Tenable, a publicly traded enterprise cybersecurity company, across a three-year embedded partnership that spanned their public offering. We have built, audited, and scaled component libraries for product teams across fintech, healthcare technology, B2B SaaS, and enterprise software.

A design system only delivers value if teams use it. Most fail not because the components are poorly designed but because the organizational infrastructure around the system was never built. We design systems and the adoption frameworks that make them stick.

Whether you are building a system from scratch, consolidating fragmented component libraries across a growing product suite, or preparing a design system that will survive a scaling engineering team, you deserve a design system agency that understands the operational complexity, not just the design deliverables.

Dotted world map showing Wandr locations

Proven impact

A Design System Agency
That Builds Systems Teams Actually Use

In the case studies below, Wandr cleaned up years of accumulated inconsistency across two enterprise products, replacing hundreds of one-off components with one system

ECOMMERCE · INTERNAL TOOL

Fanatics

7 WeeksFrom audit to handoff. Seven siloed products became one design system.

Inside Fanatics Brands division, seven internal products had been built by seven engineering teams on their own terms, with three designers covering all of them. Three teams had already tried building a component library and abandoned it. We ran the stakeholder interviews, built one unified system in Figma and Storybook, and handed over a governance model naming who keeps it alive.

"I’ve worked with Wandr during my time at Synchrony. I’ve always been pleased with their work, which is why I brought them in to help us at Fanatics. They always do a phenomenal job in what they produce, how they work seamlessly with our internal team.” Subha Shetty, VP of Product, Fanatics

See full case study

Fanatics · Ecommerce

ENTERPRISE CYBERSECURITY · PRE & POST-IPO

Tenable

3 YearsEmbedded through IPO, consolidating one system across the full portfolio.

A three-year embedded partnership through Tenable's most critical growth phase, including its public offering. We consolidated a global design system across a product portfolio that had scaled well past what its existing UI could hold, giving hundreds of engineers and designers one source of truth across every product and platform.

"WANDR has been our design partner through our most critical growth phase, including our public offering. They not only helped build new product features, but also played a critical role in producing our unified design system"Greg Capano, Senior Director of Product Design, TENABLE

See full case study

Tenable · Cybersecurity

Case 01 / 02

Drag / scroll

By the numbers

Design systems built in weeks, used for years.

100+

design system and component ibrary engagements delivered

500+

successful projects delivered

03Pace

7 Wks

average engagement, onboarding to deliverable.

04Hand-off

50%

average reduction in design-to-development handoff time.

05Accesibility

WCAG

Conformance reviewed on every audit

06Case study

7→ 1

seven siloed products consolidated into one system (Fanatics).

See case study ↗

Trusted by

The reality

Design debt compounds.

Nobody budgets for it.

01 / 04

47%

faster to build a form using an existing design system than coding it from scratch. Median 2 hours versus 4.2.

Sparkbox

01 / 04

30%

of design and development time goes to recreating UI decisions that already exist elsewhere in the product.

FORRESTER RESEARCH

01 / 04

3-5

separate component libraries in the average enterprise product, built independently by teams with no shared system.

NIELSEN NORMAN GROUP

01 / 04

50%

faster feature shipping at companies with mature design systems.

FIGMA STATE OF DESIGN SYSTEMS

Data first. Design second.

Every design system engagement starts the same way: we assess what exists, understand how your teams actually work, and identify where inconsistency and friction are creating the most cost before proposing a single component.

5 phases →

Phase 01Discover

Audit & Alignment

We audit your existing UI, workflows, and team structure. Where is inconsistency creating rework? Where are designers and engineers solving the same problem in different ways? Where does the current system break down? We find it before we design anything.

Phase 02Plan

Foundation Definition

We define the core principles, design tokens, visual foundations, and component standards that will govern the system. Foundation decisions are made with engineering input before component work begins, because changing them after is expensive.

Phase 03Design

Component Design & Documentation

We design reusable components with clear guidelines for usage, states, behavior, and accessibility. Every component is built against real product workflows, not theoretical use cases.

Phase 04Deliver

System Integration

The system is structured to integrate with your existing design and development environment, whether that is Figma, Storybook, a specific frontend framework, or a combination of tools your engineering team already uses.

Phase 05Measure

Adoption & Enablement

We ensure the system is intuitive, discoverable, and easy for teams to use. Adoption does not happen automatically. We build the onboarding materials, governance model, and feedback process that turns a design system from a deliverable into an organizational standard.

Phase 01 of 05

→ Continue scrolling

What you get

A design system your team can maintain without us.

Components are the easy part. What makes a system stick is documentation people actually read, code engineers can pull from, and a named owner for every part of it.

01 / 06Component Library

Component Library

The full set, built in Figma from atoms through templates with every pattern your products need, and one agreed version of each.

02 / 06Design Tokens

Design Tokens

Color, type, spacing, and elevation defined once as variables, so a change propagates everywhere instead of being applied by hand.

03 / 06Coded components

Coded Components

Core components built in Storybook (or a platform of your choice), so engineering pulls from the same source designers work in rather than rebuilding from a spec.

04 / 06Usage & Guidelines

Usage & Guidelines

When to use each component, when not to, and what the accessibility requirements are — written for the person who wasn't in the room.

05 / 06Pages & Templates

Pages & Templates

Assembled layouts for your most common screen types, so new pages start from a structure rather than a blank canvas.

06 / 06Governance Model

Governance Model

Who maintains the components, who maintains the code, and who enforces adoption. Written down and assigned before we leave.

Compare

How WANDR's UI/UX
‍Design Agency compares.

	In-House	Traditional Agencies
Speed to start	Competes with roadmap work	Long discovery phase	Audit to handoff in weeks
Who Decides	Whoever argues hardest wins	Whoever signs the invoice	We settle it with the teams
Code	Design ships, engineering rebuilds	Figma files, no components	Figma and Storybook, one source
Adoption	Optional, so it gets skipped	Not their problem after handoff	Governance model with named owners
Perspective	Too close to defend a hard call	No context on your org	Outside neutrality, inside context
After handoff	Maintained until someone gets busy	Engagement ends, system drifts	Built for your team to own

What our clients say

Verified Clutch reviews.

“

Their ability to understand our unique business was very impressive. We have a fairly complex business model and were concerned that they wouldn't be able to understand it enough to create an effective design — but they quickly built an understanding of who we are.

Marc YountPresident & CCO · Field Agent

See full Clutch review

“

My team had a lot of input in terms of design and copy because we had certain standards for our company. They wanted to see our company succeed and celebrated our wins with us, and that was very encouraging. We could see they were invested in the project. They didn’t just want to collect their fee and move on.

Johannah SmallFounder, Caraleya

See full Clutch review

“

We needed a very quick implementation, and they were a perfect match for us in that regard. They have a lot of experience in strategically and systematically doing design work and organizing everything in a set of pipelines, which allows them to work very quickly.

Samuel LimCEO, Grepp, Inc.

See full Clutch review

Why Wandr?

Design systems that hold up at enterprise scale.

01 · Scale

Enterprise-grade experience.

We built Fanatics' global design system and consolidated Tenable's through an embedded partnership spanning its IPO. At that scale the deliverables are the easy part. The organizational complexity is the job.

02 · Adoption

Engineering in the room from day one.

Foundation and architecture decisions get made with engineering before component work begins. A system built without their input doesn't get adopted, so alignment is a required phase rather than a courtesy.

03 · Guarantee

We stay until the friction drops.

If the system doesn't measurably reduce design-to-development friction within the first product cycle after adoption, we keep working at no additional cost until it does.

The difference

One of the World's Largest Cinema Chains,
‍now selling 25% more tickets online

Cinépolis came to us running 6,800 screens across 17 countries, with a checkout customers couldn't finish and ticket sales going to a competitor. Here's what changed.

BeforeAfter

Before WANDR — Cinepolis:

✕Outdated website and mobile app directly costing ticket sales and customers abandoning to competitors
✕Zero user testing, zero research, zero product methodology with decisions made solely by top leadership
✕Fragmented ecosystem across kiosks, back-office, website, and app across multiple countries
✕No centralized design system so the engineering teams rebuilding components from scratch every time

After WANDR — Cinepolis:

✓25% increase in online revenue after UX/UI redesign and staff augmentation engagement
✓Multi-year embedded partnership across countries, platforms, and product teams
✓Unified global design system built across all digital touchpoints (app, website, kiosks, back-office)
✓Design thinking methodology introduced and embedded into a product org that had never used it

Cinepolis·Enterprise·Cinema Chain

Who this is for

You understand that inconsistency in your product is not a visual problem.It is an operational one that compounds with every new hire, every new feature, and every new market.

We work with Directors of Design, Heads of Product, and CTOs who understand that every designer solving a UI problem that already has a solution elsewhere in the product, every engineer rebuilding a component that exists in a different codebase, and every sprint slowed down by design-to-development misalignment is not a workflow inefficiency. It is accumulated cost that a well-built design system eliminates. Your product will keep growing. The question is whether your design system grows with it or becomes the thing that holds it back.

First step

Not sure where to start?Let us audit what you already have.

Send us your Figma file and a link to your product. We'll tell you how much of your UI is already systematized, where the duplicates are, and what a real system would take. Free, no pitch, no obligation.

Get a free design system audit

Sample report

your-product.com/signup

Get started in seconds.

1No value prop above fold

2No password rules shown

3CTA hierarchy unclear

Design System Agency

Frequently asked.

Click any question to expand. If yours isn't here, write to us.

A design system agency builds, consolidates, and scales the component libraries, design tokens, usage guidelines, and governance frameworks that let product teams design and build consistently. The better ones deliver the adoption infrastructure and engineering alignment too, since those determine whether the system gets used or bypassed.

A component library is a collection of reusable UI elements. A design system is that library plus the principles, tokens, usage guidelines, and governance that determine how and when components get used. The library answers what you build with. The system answers how and why you build that way.

Build internally if you have dedicated design system ownership and prior experience with the process. Hire a design system agency when you don't, when multiple teams need to align, or when previous attempts stalled. Most internal builds fail on organizational complexity rather than design quality — stakeholder alignment, sequencing, and governance, not components.

Most design system engagements run four to twelve weeks, depending on product complexity, team size, and how much already exists. Formalizing existing components is faster than building from scratch. Consolidation across multiple teams takes longest, because audit, migration planning, and alignment all happen before the design work.

Adoption is built into the engagement rather than added at the end. Every design system we deliver includes onboarding materials, component discovery documentation, a governance model for change requests, and a feedback path so problems surface instead of getting worked around. A system teams route around isn't a system.

Design systems fail on adoption, not quality. The common causes are wrong sequencing, engineering brought in too late, no governance model, and nobody named as owner. At Fanatics we found three separate component libraries that engineering teams had started and abandoned — the capability was there, the organizational structure wasn't.

Design system pricing depends on scope: how many products the system covers, whether components need coding as well as designing, and how much already exists to consolidate. A single-product system sits at the lower end; multi-team enterprise consolidation at the higher. We scope after the audit, because the audit is what tells us which one you have.

Design systems remove duplicated work at every level: designers stop recreating existing patterns, engineers stop rebuilding components that live in another codebase, and QA stops catching inconsistencies a shared standard would have prevented. Research on Sparkbox's Carbon study found forms 47% faster to build from a system than from scratch.

Look for an audit and alignment phase before any design work, engineering involved in foundation decisions rather than consulted after, and governance and adoption delivered alongside the components. Ask to see systems still in active use rather than screenshots of deliverables — the second is easy to produce, the first isn't.

Yes, and it's the more common engagement. Most teams aren't starting from nothing — they have patterns scattered across products, partial libraries in various states, and Figma files that drifted from what shipped. Consolidation starts with an audit of what already exists and which version of each pattern wins.

Ask a question

Let's look at your product together

Send us your Figma

‍We'll show you what needs to be fixed.

Request your free design system audit. Within 72 hours we will schedule a 30-minute call to walk you through exactly where your design and engineering teams are losing time to inconsistency and what a well-built system would change. No commitment required. If it makes sense to work together, great. If not, you leave with everything we found and a clear roadmap to fix it.

Ready to go further?

Get a free design system audit

Our blog

Design System related reading.

Design System Agency forProduct Teams at Scale

Fanatics

Tenable

Audit & Alignment

Foundation Definition

Component Design & Documentation

System Integration

Adoption & Enablement

Component Library

Design Tokens

Coded Components

Usage & Guidelines

Pages & Templates

Governance Model

Enterprise-grade experience.

Engineering in the room from day one.

We stay until the friction drops.

Get started in seconds.

UX Fail: The Most Common UX Mistakes That Are Costing You Users

Exploring UX Design Patterns: Shaping Digital Experiences

Why You Need a UX Architect?

Design System Agency for
Product Teams at Scale